linux-kernel - Re: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090313.161217.52045656.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:12:17 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jesper@...gh.cc
Cc:	fubar@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, jgarzik@...hat.com, aowi@...ozymes.com
Subject: Re: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected
 - twice

From: Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:53:39 +0100

> Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> > 	However, I did find another bug I introduced during the "mii
> > refactor" patch that you mentioned as being the original source of the
> > problem.  That bug will cause 802.3ad to not notice speed changes.
> > 	Could you test the patch below on your 2.6.68.7 and/or 2.6.27.19
> > and see if it resolves your problem (without the forcedeth patch)?
> 
> There was something missing from the header to make it compile.. I found that in a later version. Patch below fixed the problem (without the forcedeth patch).

Jay please resend this with proper signoffs etc. if you want
me to apply it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/