linux-kernel - Re: [PULL] x86 cpumask work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200903131316.26455.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Fri, 13 Mar 2009 13:16:26 +1030
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Subject: Re: [PULL] x86 cpumask work

On Friday 13 March 2009 11:27:43 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote: 
> > Missing a core patch (it even got a compile warning with that 
> > config).
> So it's manual work and sometimes i notice them amongst a 
> boatload of other warnings, sometimes i dont.

Me too :(  I thought you were starting a de-warning tree?  I'd be
happy to send you patches (particularly, exporting deprecated symbols
should not give a warning!).

> > But there's something else wrong.  Firing up my 64-bit test 
> > box now.
> 
> Great - so you can reproduce. Thanks,

Yep, and I'm running some stress tests as well now.

Perhaps throw away that tree, and I'll feed you a new one (the
core patch needs to go at the front), but I can work either way.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/