lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0903122311160.18396@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Thu, 12 Mar 2009 23:17:21 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <srostedt@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/16] tracing: have event_trace_printk use static
 tracer



On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:

> > +#define event_trace_printk(ip, fmt, args...)				\
> > +do {									\
> > +	__trace_printk_check_format(fmt, ##args);			\
> > +	tracing_record_cmdline(current);				\
> > +	if (__builtin_constant_p(fmt)) {				\
> > +		static const char *trace_printk_fmt			\
> > +		  __attribute__((section("__trace_printk_fmt"))) =	\
> > +			__builtin_constant_p(fmt) ? fmt : NULL;		\
> 
> Why __builtin_constant_p(fmt) evaluate twice?

It's explained in another patch. But this was a real PITA. We first tried 
this with just the "if (__builtin_return_p(fmt))" but the way gcc works, 
it handles the global data assignments before optimizing out condition 
logic. Thus we ended up getting errors about can not initialize static 
variable with a non constant.

But the ? : operation of the assignment is optimized before the assignment
is made. Thus, if fmt is not constant, then we avoid this warning. Then
during the conditional optimization, gcc will remove that part of the code 
altogether.

Thus the double __builtin_constant_p(fmt) is needed twice. Try taking out 
one of them and see what happens with:

myfunc(const char *fmt) {

  event_trace_printk(fmt);

}

Of course the way this is made, we may not call it that way, but I wanted 
to be safe.

-- Steve

> 
> 
> > +									\
> > +		__trace_bprintk(ip, trace_printk_fmt, ##args);		\
> > +	} else								\
> > +		__trace_printk(ip, fmt, ##args);			\
> > +} while (0)
> 
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ