[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28c262360903131727l4ef41db5xf917c7c5eb4825a8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 09:27:43 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
peterz@...radead.org, nrik.Berkhan@...com, uclinux-dev@...inux.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
hannes@...xchg.org, riel@...riel.com, lee.schermerhorn@...com,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Make the Unevictable LRU available on NOMMU
Hi, David.
It seems your patch is better than mine. Thanks. :)
But my concern is that as Peter pointed out, unevictable lru's
solution is not fundamental one.
He want to remove ramfs page from lru list to begin with.
I guess Andrew also thought same thing with Peter.
I think it's a fundamental solution. but it may be long term solution.
This patch can solve NOMMU problem in current status.
Andrew, What do you think about it ?
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 2:33 AM, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> The first patch causes the mlock() bits added by CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU to be
> unavailable in NOMMU mode.
>
> The second patch makes CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU available in NOMMU mode.
>
> David
>
--
Kinds regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists