| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 09:27:43 +0900 From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com> To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org, nrik.Berkhan@...com, uclinux-dev@...inux.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, hannes@...xchg.org, riel@...riel.com, lee.schermerhorn@...com, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Make the Unevictable LRU available on NOMMU Hi, David. It seems your patch is better than mine. Thanks. :) But my concern is that as Peter pointed out, unevictable lru's solution is not fundamental one. He want to remove ramfs page from lru list to begin with. I guess Andrew also thought same thing with Peter. I think it's a fundamental solution. but it may be long term solution. This patch can solve NOMMU problem in current status. Andrew, What do you think about it ? On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 2:33 AM, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote: > > The first patch causes the mlock() bits added by CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU to be > unavailable in NOMMU mode. > > The second patch makes CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU available in NOMMU mode. > > David > -- Kinds regards, Minchan Kim -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists