linux-kernel - Re: [E1000-devel] [stable] Li-nux 2.6.27.19 2.6.28.7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 14 Mar 2009 10:21:51 +0900
From:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To:	jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, greg@...ah.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc:	e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [E1000-devel] [stable] Li-nux 2.6.27.19  2.6.28.7

Hello.

Brandeburg, Jesse wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 03:10:51PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> 
> >> I fired up this kernel up on my FC8 laptop and I see
> >> http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/p3130212.jpg
> >> 
> >> On the next two boot attempts, the kernel came up OK.
> >> 
That picture may be caused by /dev/root being automatically disappeared.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488679

> root issue:
> seems that something with the 2.6.newer doesn't like some of the stuff with the fedora nash stuff.
> mkinitrd and friends were updated multiple times to work with these newer kernels in the fedora 10
> I was using.  I worked around by changing root=LABEL to use root=/dev/foo in grub.conf

I don't experience this problem with Debian Sarge.
I think it is Fedora's nash problem.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/