[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200903141101.47961.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 11:01:46 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
pm list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [update, rev. 6] Re: [PATCH 1/10] PM: Rework handling of interrupts during suspend-resume (rev. 5)
On Saturday 14 March 2009, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags);
> > >
> > > Ditto
> >
> > No, because of __setup_irq().
>
> Sorry, forgot about that. Ok. Keep the locking in pm.c then.
Will do, thanks.
OK, it seems we're approaching the final version. :-)
I'm going to split the $subject patch as requested by Ingo (API changes and
functionality changes) and post the full series once again for completness.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists