| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 13:37:04 +0000 From: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...oo.com> To: Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: 2.6.29-rc breaks STD using Intel 945 On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 07:02:17PM +0100, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > Sitsofe Wheeler wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 08:20:56PM +0100, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > > > I tested several snapshots post 2.6.28 and all of them show one severe > > > problem: resume from disk is not always successful. Only about 50% of the > > > resume attempts work, in the other cases I just get a completely black > > > screen, can't switch to text console or anything. What I often get is a > > > line like this in the logs directly before suspend: > > > > Does this happen when X hasn't been started and you suspend to disk then > > resume? > > I tested several times without X, with X running only in backgroud (i.e. me > initiating the suspend from console) and from xdm only. Never it froze. That > leads me to the conclusion that it is probably related to composite. I'm Hmm. Does switching to and then back from a virtual terminal also break? -- Sitsofe | http://sucs.org/~sits/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists