[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090314232411.4495.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:29:05 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, Enrik.Berkhan@...com,
uclinux-dev@...inux.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NOMMU: Pages allocated to a ramfs inode's pagecache may get wrongly discarded
> > (1) page migration code depend on the page stay on lru.
> > (2) "taking off at reclaim time" can avoid adding lock to fastpath.
> > anyway, complely removing from lru need something lock.
> > we disliked it at that time.
>
> Agreed with (1). NOMMU can't support migration, though. But keeping
> them off the LRU on NOMMU needs adjustment of the page cache
> read/write code in mm/filemap.c.
yes.
> I'm not quite sure I understand (2). But never adding these pages on
> the LRU means we never have to remove them anywhere, no?
Yeah, you are right.
I was confused to munlock/shm_unlock case.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists