linux-kernel - Re: Lockdep problem involving sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 15 Mar 2009 00:05:08 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Subject: Re: Lockdep problem involving sysfs_mutex in ext4 in linux-next

On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 10:02 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> I'm occasionally seeing a circular locking dependency in linux-next when
> I unmount an ext4 filesystem, apparently involving sysfs_mutex in
> sysfs_addrm_start(), and I have no idea what's going on.  Some help from
> kobject experts would be greatly appreciated.  I assume I must be doing
> something wrong.  I took the basic pattern from btrfs, but I suspect I
> may have broken some of the kobject lifetime rules when I adapted what I
> needed for ext4.
> 
> It doesn't happen all the time, and it seems to be caused by how I'm
> releasing the ext4's sysfs kobject.  In ext4_put_super():
> 
> 	kobject_put(&sbi->s_kobj);
> 	wait_for_completion(&sbi->s_kobj_unregister);

Right that would require sysfs_mutex() while you're holding s_lock.

> The circular locking dependency is:
> 
> [32667.071746] =======================================================
> [32667.071751] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> [32667.071755] 2.6.29-rc7-00043-gafbc462 #11
> [32667.071758] -------------------------------------------------------
> [32667.071762] umount/2310 is trying to acquire lock:
> [32667.071764]  (sysfs_mutex){--..}, at: [<c01f7130>] sysfs_addrm_start+0x28/0x9a
> [32667.071778] 
> [32667.071779] but task is already holding lock:
> [32667.071782]  (&type->s_lock_key#5){--..}, at: [<c01b752b>] lock_super+0x26/0x28

And here you snipped the interesting bit here it tells us how you
normally have the reverse lock order, namely:

 sysfs_mutex.
   s_lock

> [32667.072279]  [<c01f7130>] ? sysfs_addrm_start+0x28/0x9a
> [32667.072284]  [<c04c60ca>] __mutex_lock_common+0xdc/0x33a
> [32667.072289]  [<c01f7130>] ? sysfs_addrm_start+0x28/0x9a
> [32667.072294]  [<c04c63cf>] mutex_lock_nested+0x33/0x3b
> [32667.072300]  [<c01f7130>] ? sysfs_addrm_start+0x28/0x9a
> [32667.072304]  [<c01f7130>] sysfs_addrm_start+0x28/0x9a
> [32667.072309]  [<c01f75ba>] sysfs_remove_dir+0x77/0xab
> [32667.072314]  [<c02d5b2f>] kobject_del+0xf/0x2c
> [32667.072319]  [<c02d5c80>] kobject_release+0x134/0x1cb
> [32667.072323]  [<c02d5b4c>] ? kobject_release+0x0/0x1cb
> [32667.072328]  [<c02d69e4>] kref_put+0x3c/0x4a
> [32667.072333]  [<c02d5ac8>] kobject_put+0x37/0x3c
> [32667.072337]  [<c021cd89>] ext4_put_super+0xab/0x215
> [32667.072342]  [<c01b7fed>] generic_shutdown_super+0x62/0xe3
> [32667.072346]  [<c01b8090>] kill_block_super+0x22/0x36
> [32667.072352]  [<c01e6f52>] ? vfs_quota_off+0x0/0x17
> [32667.072357]  [<c01b815b>] deactivate_super+0x5c/0x6f
> [32667.072361]  [<c01c8c34>] mntput_no_expire+0xd4/0x106
> [32667.072366]  [<c01c9138>] sys_umount+0x2a1/0x2c6
> [32667.072370]  [<c01c916f>] sys_oldumount+0x12/0x14
> [32667.072375]  [<c0117ff6>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
> [32667.072380]  [<c0110000>] ? x86_decode_insn+0x349/0xbc9



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/