[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090315123715.70490281@mjolnir.ossman.eu>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 12:37:15 +0100
From: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@...eus.cx>
To: Wolfgang Mües <wolfgang.mues@...rswald.de>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Matt Fleming" <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
"David Brownell" <dbrownell@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
"Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] mmc_spi: convert timeout handling to jiffies and
avoid busy waiting
On Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:35:03 +0100
Wolfgang Mües <wolfgang.mues@...rswald.de> wrote:
> @@ -816,8 +819,11 @@ mmc_spi_data_do(struct mmc_spi_host *hos
> else
> clock_rate = spi->max_speed_hz;
>
> - timeout = ktime_add_ns(ktime_set(0, 0), data->timeout_ns +
> - data->timeout_clks * 1000000 / clock_rate);
> + timeout = data->timeout_ns +
> + data->timeout_clks * 1000000 / clock_rate;
> + timeout = usecs_to_jiffies((unsigned int)(timeout / 1000));
> + if (!timeout)
> + timeout = 1;
>
Does this round properly upwards? Having a timeout 6 ms shorter than it
should be can be a real problem (although the huge timeout your other
patch introduces means we probably won't be affected by it).
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
encryption.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists