linux-kernel - [patch] eventfd - remove fput() call from possible IRQ context (2nd rev)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0903151303490.16762@makko.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Date:	Sun, 15 Mar 2009 13:08:44 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
To:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
cc:	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
	linux-aio <linux-aio@...ck.org>, zach.brown@...cle.com
Subject: [patch] eventfd - remove fput() call from possible IRQ context (2nd
 rev)

The following patch remove a possible source of fput() call from inside 
IRQ context. Myself, like Eric, wasn't able to reproduce an fput() call 
from IRQ context, but conceptually the bug is there.
This patch adds an optimization similar to the one we already do on 
->ki_filp, on ->ki_eventfd. Playing with ->f_count directly is not pretty 
in general, but the alternative here would be to add a brand new delayed 
fput() infrastructure, that I'm not sure is worth it.



On Sun, 15 Mar 2009, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:

> This looks reasonably sane, the only concern I have with it is that I think 
> it logically makes more sense to use the same convention for fi_filp and 
> ki_eventfd, as the different in IS_ERR vs checking for NULL is a bit 
> confusing.  Aside from that, it looks like it should fix the problem 
> correctly.

Makes sense.



Signed-off-by: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>


- Davide


---
 fs/aio.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.mod/fs/aio.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.mod.orig/fs/aio.c	2009-03-14 09:24:12.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.mod/fs/aio.c	2009-03-15 12:54:10.000000000 -0700
@@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static struct kiocb *__aio_get_req(struc
 	req->private = NULL;
 	req->ki_iovec = NULL;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&req->ki_run_list);
-	req->ki_eventfd = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+	req->ki_eventfd = NULL;
 
 	/* Check if the completion queue has enough free space to
 	 * accept an event from this io.
@@ -485,8 +485,6 @@ static inline void really_put_req(struct
 {
 	assert_spin_locked(&ctx->ctx_lock);
 
-	if (!IS_ERR(req->ki_eventfd))
-		fput(req->ki_eventfd);
 	if (req->ki_dtor)
 		req->ki_dtor(req);
 	if (req->ki_iovec != &req->ki_inline_vec)
@@ -508,8 +506,11 @@ static void aio_fput_routine(struct work
 		list_del(&req->ki_list);
 		spin_unlock_irq(&fput_lock);
 
-		/* Complete the fput */
-		__fput(req->ki_filp);
+		/* Complete the fput(s) */
+		if (req->ki_filp != NULL)
+			__fput(req->ki_filp);
+		if (req->ki_eventfd != NULL)
+			__fput(req->ki_eventfd);
 
 		/* Link the iocb into the context's free list */
 		spin_lock_irq(&ctx->ctx_lock);
@@ -527,12 +528,14 @@ static void aio_fput_routine(struct work
  */
 static int __aio_put_req(struct kioctx *ctx, struct kiocb *req)
 {
+	int schedule_putreq = 0;
+
 	dprintk(KERN_DEBUG "aio_put(%p): f_count=%ld\n",
 		req, atomic_long_read(&req->ki_filp->f_count));
 
 	assert_spin_locked(&ctx->ctx_lock);
 
-	req->ki_users --;
+	req->ki_users--;
 	BUG_ON(req->ki_users < 0);
 	if (likely(req->ki_users))
 		return 0;
@@ -540,10 +543,23 @@ static int __aio_put_req(struct kioctx *
 	req->ki_cancel = NULL;
 	req->ki_retry = NULL;
 
-	/* Must be done under the lock to serialise against cancellation.
-	 * Call this aio_fput as it duplicates fput via the fput_work.
+	/*
+	 * Try to optimize the aio and eventfd file* puts, by avoiding to
+	 * schedule work in case it is not __fput() time. In normal cases,
+	 * we wouldn not be holding the last reference to the file*, so
+	 * this function will be executed w/out any aio kthread wakeup.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(atomic_long_dec_and_test(&req->ki_filp->f_count))) {
+	if (unlikely(atomic_long_dec_and_test(&req->ki_filp->f_count)))
+		schedule_putreq++;
+	else
+		req->ki_filp = NULL;
+	if (unlikely(req->ki_eventfd != NULL)) {
+		if (unlikely(atomic_long_dec_and_test(&req->ki_eventfd->f_count)))
+			schedule_putreq++;
+		else
+			req->ki_eventfd = NULL;
+	}
+	if (unlikely(schedule_putreq)) {
 		get_ioctx(ctx);
 		spin_lock(&fput_lock);
 		list_add(&req->ki_list, &fput_head);
@@ -1009,7 +1025,7 @@ int aio_complete(struct kiocb *iocb, lon
 	 * eventfd. The eventfd_signal() function is safe to be called
 	 * from IRQ context.
 	 */
-	if (!IS_ERR(iocb->ki_eventfd))
+	if (iocb->ki_eventfd != NULL)
 		eventfd_signal(iocb->ki_eventfd, 1);
 
 put_rq:
@@ -1608,6 +1624,7 @@ static int io_submit_one(struct kioctx *
 		req->ki_eventfd = eventfd_fget((int) iocb->aio_resfd);
 		if (IS_ERR(req->ki_eventfd)) {
 			ret = PTR_ERR(req->ki_eventfd);
+			req->ki_eventfd = NULL;
 			goto out_put_req;
 		}
 	}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/