[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200903142102.56602.phillips@phunq.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:02:56 -0700
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@...nq.net>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
Cc: tux3@...3.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Tux3] Tux3 report: Tux3 Git tree available
On Thursday 12 March 2009, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > By the way, the endian comment in bitmap.c needs some loving:
> >
> > http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.28.7/lib/bitmap.c#L35
> >
> > The s390 file needs to be config-independent:
> >
> > - include/asm-s390/bitops.h
> > + arch/s390/include/asm/bitops.h
> >
> > and the ppc file is nowhere to be seen. I will put a driveby patch on
> > the to.do list.
>
> The ppc file is arch/powerpc/include/asm/bitops.h.
Ah right, so the commentary should just reference arch/ instead of
/..asm-<arch>. I am still hoping to hear an actual argument why little
endian bitops are "more natural" than big endian. I don't know of any
myself, either in terms of machine instructions, cycle times or
whatever.
Regards,
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists