lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090315003743.GB11052@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 15 Mar 2009 00:37:44 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...ena.org.uk>
To:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.29-rc8 regulator-next] regulator: init fixes (v4)

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 05:25:35PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:

> +	} else if (ops->is_enabled) {
> +		/* ... if the bootloader left it on, drivers need a
> +		 * nonzero enable count else it can't be disabled.
> +		 */
> +		ret = ops->is_enabled(rdev);
> +		if (ret > 0)
> +			rdev->use_count = 1;
> +		ret = 0;

This means that drivers that do balanced enables and disables will never
be able to cause the regulator to actually be disabled since there will
always be this extra reference count there.  Without this patch what'll
happen with those drivers is that they'll do an enable then later on
when the last one disables its supply the reference count will fall to
zero and the regulator will be disabled.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ