linux-kernel - Re: COW optimization on exec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <22520422.post@talk.nabble.com>
Date:	Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
From:	sidc7 <siddhartha.chhabra@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: COW optimization on exec


> exec throws out all those pages, so go away without ever having been
> copied. However it still costs memory CPU time TLB flushes etc in order
> to set up the COW optimisation in the first place, so if you are doing
> fork/exec, then I think vfork is the better option.


Thanks once again, if I do something like creating an array spanning over
multiple pages, and then do a fork and in the child or the parent, write to
the array elements, this should result in an actual cow, where the OS will
actually do a copy of the pages as well in addition to the overhead required
for setting up COW in the first place?

Thanks


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/COW-optimization-on-exec-tp22519639p22520422.html
Sent from the linux-kernel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/