linux-kernel - 2.6.29-rcx triviality - How to have foo.ko module with same name as foo.c source file

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49BCD2F6.6030903@panasas.com>
Date:	Sun, 15 Mar 2009 12:05:42 +0200
From:	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: 2.6.29-rcx triviality - How to have foo.ko module with same name
 as foo.c source file

Since sometime in the 2.6.29-rc I'm no longer able to produce an
out-of-tree module that has the same base-name as a source file.

This is what I had in 2.6.28:
<Kbuild>
    obj-m += foo.o
</Kbuild>
Where foo.c is a source file in the same directory.

But since 2.6.29-rcx it will no longer build my foo.ko module. I
had to change it to:
<Kbuild>
    foo_mod-y = foo.o
    obj-m += foo_mod.o
</Kbuild>
Which changed my module name in scripts and packages.

[Q]
  Is it possible to build a module with exact same base-name as it's single
  source file?

P.S:
  Just asking I realized that I can just add an "mv ..." command to my make file.
  But is this expected behaviour?

Thanks in advance
Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/