[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090316084802.GB1062@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:48:02 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Mike Travis <travis@....com>
Subject: Re: [PULL] x86 cpumask work
* Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
> On Sunday 15 March 2009 16:30:44 Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > > } else if (check_c1e_idle(c)) {
> > > printk(KERN_INFO "using C1E aware idle routine\n");
> > > - alloc_cpumask_var(&c1e_mask, GFP_KERNEL);
> > > - cpumask_clear(c1e_mask);
> > > + /* c1e_mask can only be NULL during boot of first cpu. */
> > > + if (c1e_mask == NULL) {
> > > + alloc_cpumask_var(&c1e_mask, GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > Sigh, there are two bugs here:
> >
> > 1) what if the GFP_KERNEL allocation fails?
>
> As the comments says, it can only be NULL during boot of the first CPU.
>
> start_kernel -> check_bugs -> identify_boot_cpu -> identify_cpu
> -> select_idle_routine.
>
> Did you want me to panic if it fails?
Ah, ok. But i think it's very unobvious to embedd a "once per
bootup" dynamic allocation like that. Please put it into a
separate init routine instead. That way select_idle() [which
runs during every CPU hotplug event] wont have this allocation.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists