linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Point the UNEVICTABLE_LRU config option at the documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090316211830.1FE8.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:22:32 +0900 (JST)
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, lee.schermerhorn@...com,
	minchan.kim@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Point the UNEVICTABLE_LRU config option at the documentation

> On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:59:45AM +0000, David Howells wrote:
> > Point the UNEVICTABLE_LRU config option at the documentation describing the
> > option.
> 
> Didn't we decide a while ago that the option is pointless and the code
> should always be enabled?

Yeah.
CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU lost existing reason by David's good patch recently.

if nobody of nommu user post bug report in .30 age, I plan to remove
this config option at .31 age.

his patch is really really good job.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/