linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.27.19 + 28.7: network timeouts for r8169 and 8139too

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49BE4EF6.3030406@grupopie.com>
Date:	Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:07:02 +0000
From:	Rui Santos <rsantos@...popie.com>
To:	Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
CC:	Michael Büker <m.bueker@...lin.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.27.19 + 28.7: network timeouts for r8169 and 8139too

Rui Santos wrote:
> If I get any further I'll let you know.
>
> Regards,
> Rui Santos
>
>   
I Finally ended up the big bisect operation. The commit responsible for
this issue is commit
b726e493e8dc13537d1d7f8cd66bcd28516606c3
labeled
'r8169: sync existing 8168 device hardware start sequences with vendor
driver'

With that patch removed, I  was able to get a sustained 40MB/s+ on a
20GB ftp transfer. I wasn't able to do it with the specified patch applied.
Just as a side note, I was never able to reproduce it on a 100MBit
connection, only on a full 1GBit one...

However this patch will not reverse on the current kernel.

What do you think the next step should be ?
As usual, if you need any testing, please do let me know.

Regards,
Rui Santos

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/