[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2f11576a0903160614n4908d0fdo25df387dd724ac19@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:14:11 +0900
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, lee.schermerhorn@...com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Point the UNEVICTABLE_LRU config option at the
documentation
2009/3/16 Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>:
> size vmlinux
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 6232681 747665 708608 7688954 7552fa vmlinux
>
> size vmlinux.unevictable
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 6239404 747985 708608 7695997 756e7d vmlinux.unevictable
>
> It almost increases about 7K.
> Many embedded guys always have a concern about size although it is very small.
> It's important about embedded but may not be about server.
Thanks good report.
this is unintetional size to me. I'll digg it later.
Thanks!
-- kosaki
>
> In addition, CONFIG_UNEVICTABLE_LRU feature don't have a big impact in
> embedded machines which have a very small ram.
> I guess many embedded guys will not use this feature.
>
> So, I don't want to remove this configurable option.
> Lets not add useless size bloat in embedded system.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists