[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090316072904.733e7e43@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 07:29:04 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com>
Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>,
"Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Xen-devel" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 10/24] xen: mask XSAVE from cpuid
On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:16:32 +0000
"Jan Beulich" <jbeulich@...ell.com> wrote:
> >>> Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> 16.03.09 01:09 >>>
> >Well.. pretty much all new instructions need Xen modifications due to
> >the need to be emulate to deal with traps/vmexits/etc right?
> >So I don't quite see many cpuid bits that would NOT involve some Xen
> >modification or another ;)
>
> No, new (user-mode accessible) instructions represent precisely the
> kind of extension that do not require hypervisor (or OS) awareness
> (see SSE2 etc, AES, FMA).
so Xen doesn't need to handle a case where the kernel does AES on
uncached IO memory ?
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists