[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0903161239450.17730@qirst.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:41:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch -mm v2] cpusets: add memory_slab_hardwall flag
If the nodes are exclusive to a load then the cpus attached to those nodes
are also exclusive? If so then there is no problem since the percpu queues
are only in use for a specific load with a consistent restriction on
cpusets and a consistent memory policy. Thus there is no need for
memory_slab_hardwall.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists