[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <49BE9B4A.5040106@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:32:42 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
CC: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm/x86: check KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH with irqs disabled
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> BTW, I've wondered if the local_irq_enable in svm_vcpu_run is safe:
>
> clgi();
>
> local_irq_enable();
>
> There is no way that an interrupt can be handled there without an exit,
> right?
>
clgi trumps sti, so all interrupts will be deferred until the guest is
entered (which will cause an immediate vmexit).
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists