[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090316183739.GA10292@Krystal>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:37:39 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <compudj@...stal.dyndns.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...stprotocols.net,
fweisbec@...il.com, fche@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 2/2] tracepoints for softirq entry/exit - tracepoints
* Steven Rostedt (rostedt@...dmis.org) wrote:
>
> On Fri, 13 Mar 2009, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>
> > * Jason Baron (jbaron@...hat.com) wrote:
> > >
> > > introduce softirq entry/exit tracepoints. These are useful for
> > > augmenting existing tracers, and to figure out softirq frequencies and
> > > timings.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > include/trace/irq_event_types.h | 12 ++++++++++++
> > > kernel/softirq.c | 7 ++++++-
> > > 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> > >
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/trace/irq_event_types.h b/include/trace/irq_event_types.h
> > > index 214bb92..38b4bdd 100644
> > > --- a/include/trace/irq_event_types.h
> > > +++ b/include/trace/irq_event_types.h
> > > @@ -40,4 +40,16 @@ TRACE_EVENT(irq_handler_exit,
> > > __entry->irq, __entry->ret ? "handled" : "unhandled")
> > > );
> > >
> > > +TRACE_FORMAT(irq_softirq_entry,
> > > + TP_PROTO(struct softirq_action *h, struct softirq_action *vec),
> > > + TP_ARGS(h, vec),
> > > + TP_FMT("softirq=%d action=%s", h - vec, softirq_to_name[h-vec])
> > > + );
> > > +
> > > +TRACE_FORMAT(irq_softirq_exit,
> > > + TP_PROTO(struct softirq_action *h, struct softirq_action *vec),
> > > + TP_ARGS(h, vec),
> > > + TP_FMT("softirq=%d action=%s", h - vec, softirq_to_name[h-vec])
> >
> > The softirq tracepoints are a good idea indeed (I have similar ones in
> > the LTTng tree). My main concern is about the fact that you output the
> > softirq name in plain text to the trace buffers. I would rather prefer
> > to save only the softirq (h-vec) into the trace and dump the mapping
> > (h-vec) to name only once, so we can save precious trace bytes.
>
> The TP_FMT is only used by those tracers that want to use it. Any tracer
> can still hook directly to the trace point and do what every they want.
>
> -- Steve
>
By doing so, you are removing the ability to use the TP_FMT information
to perform high-speed system-wide tracing. I thought the goal was to
create a unified buffering, but sadly I don't see the high-speed
requirements being part of that plan.
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists