linux-kernel - Re: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090316.133559.173588446.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:35:59 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	jesper@...gh.cc
Cc:	fubar@...ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, jgarzik@...hat.com, aowi@...ozymes.com
Subject: Re: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected
 - twice

From: Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:34:38 +0100

> Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> > 	The above fragment isn't needed for mainline, only for -stable.
> > 
> 
> Did you sent it off to the stable kernel maintainers?

The fix has to go into Linus's tree first.

I haven't integrated Jay's changes yet.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/