lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <185407190903161423r58f2c79ao3adc469e08a67e27@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:23:59 +0100
From:	Pedro Larroy <pedro.larroy.lists@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Different buffered IO performance with SCSI and SATA with same 
	unbuffered performance

Hello. I'm puzzled about these measures with one U2W/160 SCSI disk and
a WD raptor SATA.
kernel is 2.6.28.7
This measures are on the same box, notice the very low rate of
buffered with the sata drive.

sata drive:
hdparm -t /dev/sdb
Timing buffered disk reads:   54 MB in  3.04 seconds =  17.78 MB/sec
hdparm --direct -t /dev/sdb
Timing O_DIRECT disk reads:  178 MB in  3.03 seconds =  58.67 MB/sec

scsi drive:
hdparm -t /dev/sda
Timing buffered disk reads:  200 MB in  3.03 seconds =  66.10 MB/sec
hdparm --direct -t /dev/sda
Timing O_DIRECT disk reads:  200 MB in  3.02 seconds =  66.14 MB/sec

Is this ok?

Regards. Pedro.

Download attachment "config" of type "application/octet-stream" (52284 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ