[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200903162253.55940.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:53:55 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Rolf Eike Beer <eike-kernel@...tec.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: No warning on resume with different kernel version
On Monday 16 March 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2009-03-16 21:33:10, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday 16 March 2009, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > On Sat 2009-03-14 16:28:59, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I'm sure this had worked before. And since I don't do that on a regular basis,
> > > > but only by accident, I have no idea when it stopped working. But with my
> > > > 2.6.28 kernel and everything more recent I don't get a warning if there is a
> > > > suspend image of a different kernel version, but simply the new kernel starts
> > > > and throws everything away. Is this a kernel fault or something with the
> > > > userspace stuff? Whom to blame for this?
> > >
> > > Actually, it should now be possible to resume with different kernel
> > > than the one that did the suspendding...
> >
> > As long as it is 64-bit.
> >
> > Something broke if that doesn't work.
> >
> > Rolf, is your kernel 64-bit?
>
> And in 32-bit case, we should refuse to load the image. Something
> broke if that does not work :-).
Well, the description suggests the boot kernel didn't load the image, but
just continued to boot. That really depends on what "throws everything away"
means in the original report. Rolf?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists