[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1237244137.4964.54.camel@kulgan.wumi.org.au>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:25:37 +1030
From: Kevin Shanahan <kmshanah@...b.org.au>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [Bug #12465] KVM guests stalling on 2.6.28 (bisected)
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 21:07 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> I've looked a bit at your traces.
> I think it's probably too wide to find something inside.
> Latest -tip is provided with a new set of events tracing, meaning
> that you will be able to produce function graph traces with various
> sched events included.
>
> Another thing, is it possible to reproduce it with only one ping?
> Or testing perioding pings and keep only one that raised a relevant
> threshold of latency? I think we could do a script that can do that.
> It would make the trace much clearer.
Yeah, I think that should be possible. If you can come up with such a
script, that would be great.
> Just wait a bit, I'm looking at which event could be relevant to enable
> and I come back to you with a set of commands to test.
Excellent! Thanks for looking into this.
Cheers,
Kevin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists