linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: twl4030 VAUX3 supports 3.0V

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <49BF52F9.2030708@nokia.com>
Date:	Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:36:25 +0200
From:	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...ia.com>
To:	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>
CC:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...ena.org.uk>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-omap Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: twl4030 VAUX3 supports 3.0V

Liam Girdwood wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 14:48 -0800, David Brownell wrote:
>> On Friday 06 March 2009, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> Would it make sense to make this platform data so that if a given board
>>> requires running the chip like this it can be enabled for those boards
>>> but it's not something people might turn on because it seems useful?
>> Let's hear if it's actually needed, first.  :)
>>
>> I coded those tables so that it would be easy to kick in the
>> support for out-of-spec operation if it's really needed.  But
>> so far we don't know that it's needed, and I'd rather it not
>> be too easy to run like that.
>>
> 
> I've now reverted this patch. 

TI say we can use VAUX3 at 3V and expect no problems:

http://community.ti.com/forums/p/3777/14574.aspx

So how do we do it?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/