[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1237279833.3464.4.camel@ht.satnam>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:20:33 +0530
From: Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@...nel.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [git-pull -tip] x86: cleanup 20090317
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 09:38 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 23:33 +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > >
> > > > -static struct clock_event_device pit_clockevent = {
> > > > +static struct clock_event_device pit_dev = {
> > >
> > > Why do we need to change the name of the variable ? Just for fun or
> > > is pit_dev more self explaining than pit_clockevent ?
> >
> > pit already means it is a clock event, but with this change:
> >
> > 1. we save 8 characters per declaration
> > 2. It solves various 80 characters problem
>
> There is not a single 80 character problem in that file.
Here are 80 character problems:
1. pit_clockevent.mult = div_sc(CLOCK_TICK_RATE, NSEC_PER_SEC,
pit_clockevent.shift);
2. pit_clockevent.max_delta_ns =
clockevent_delta2ns(0x7FFF, &pit_clockevent);
3. pit_clockevent.min_delta_ns =
clockevent_delta2ns(0xF, &pit_clockevent);
4. clocksource_pit.mult = clocksource_hz2mult(CLOCK_TICK_RATE,
clocksource_pit.shift);
--
JSR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists