linux-kernel - Re: wrong timestamps in ftrace?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E1Ljbp3-0005Zc-2J@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date:	Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:07:21 +0100
From:	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To:	mingo@...e.hu
CC:	miklos@...redi.hu, fweisbec@...il.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: wrong timestamps in ftrace?

On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu> wrote:
> > 
> > So according to the timestamps the time difference between the first
> > and last event was just 0.12s, which is rubbish.
> > 
> > This is latest git on a CoreDuo T60 notebook.  Attaching .config and
> > dmesg.
> 
> There's been changes to timestamping in the tracing tree. Could you 
> check whether latest -tip:
> 
>    http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README
> 
> works better for you?

Unfortunately no, it's behaving exatly the same.

# uname -a
Linux tucsk 2.6.29-rc8-tip-02571-g0fcb24f-dirty #9 SMP PREEMPT Tue Mar 17 16:53:41 CET 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Thanks,
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/