linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.29-rc6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090317172811.GA33403@dspnet.fr.eu.org>
Date:	Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:28:11 +0100
From:	Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>
To:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29-rc6

On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 05:13:22PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> That's why i could put the delta analysis there. We are capturing 
> thousands of measurement points, and what matters is the precision 
> of the 'pair' of (PIT,TSC) timestamp measurements.
> 
> I got roughly the same end result noise and the same anomalies with 
> tracing enabled and disabled. (and the number of data points was cut 
> in half with tracing enabled)

Any reason for not doing a bog-standard linear regression?

  OG.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/