[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14026175.11106541237315189656.JavaMail.root@ouachita>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:39:49 -0400 (EDT)
From: Joe Malicki <jmalicki@...acarta.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Cc: chrisw@...s-sol.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CRED: Fix check_unsafe_exec()
----- "Hugh Dickins" <hugh@...itas.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2009, David Howells wrote:
> > Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com> wrote:
> >
> > > We do. See the original thread. It's here at
> > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/26/233
> > > and appended below for convenience. We do know that patch did
> not
> > > fix Joe's problem, and we don't yet know whether addressing the
> > > files->count issue will actually fix it, but I'm hopeful.
> >
> > Looks reasonable.
>
> Thanks for taking a look.
>
> Yes, I'm inclined to go with that, and removing the files->count
> check from exec.c. Joe, did you manage to try your testing with
> my original patch plus that files->count check removed from 2.6.28's
> unsafe_exec()?
Sorry for not responding earlier.
I still got one failure with this new patch. I added some printks
to illuminate exactly why it's failing when it fails to setuid, but
of course, since adding the printks I haven't reproduced yet.
Very weird...
Thanks,
Joe
> Since Joe's bug has been around forever (if it is what we think it
> is), I'm disinclined to rush the fix - something nice to add to
> -stable, rather than needing to squeeze into 2.6.29.
>
> Hugh
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists