| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <49BEED59.4060700@goop.org> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:22:49 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com> CC: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: [PATCH] x86-64: non-paravirt systems always have PSE and PGE A paravirtualized system may not have PSE or PGE available to guests, to they are not required features. However, without paravirt we can assume that any x86-64 implementation will have them available. Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h index d5cd6c5..64cf2d2 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/required-features.h @@ -48,9 +48,15 @@ #endif #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64 +#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT +/* Paravirtualized systems may not have PSE or PGE available */ #define NEED_PSE 0 +#define NEED_PGE 0 +#else +#define NEED_PSE (1<<(X86_FEATURE_PSE) & 31) +#define NEED_PGE (1<<(X86_FEATURE_PGE) & 31) +#endif #define NEED_MSR (1<<(X86_FEATURE_MSR & 31)) -#define NEED_PGE (1<<(X86_FEATURE_PGE & 31)) #define NEED_FXSR (1<<(X86_FEATURE_FXSR & 31)) #define NEED_XMM (1<<(X86_FEATURE_XMM & 31)) #define NEED_XMM2 (1<<(X86_FEATURE_XMM2 & 31)) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists