lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090318092238.24787.6657.stgit@sofia.in.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:52:38 +0530
From:	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
To:	"Vaidyanathan Srinivasan" <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Suresh Siddha" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	"Balbir Singh" <balbir@...ibm.com>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3 4/6] sched: Rename the variable sched_mc_preferred_wakeup_cpu

sched_mc_ preferred_wakeup_cpu is currently used when the user seeks
power savings through aggressive task consolidation.

This is applicable for both sched_mc_power_savings as well as
sched_smt_power_savings. So rename sched_mc_preferred_wakeup_cpu to
preferred_wakeup_cpu.

Also fix the comment for preferred_wakeup_cpu.

Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
---

 kernel/sched.c      |   12 +++++++-----
 kernel/sched_fair.c |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
index 864c6ca..16d7655 100644
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -515,11 +515,13 @@ struct root_domain {
 #endif
 #if defined(CONFIG_SCHED_MC) || defined(CONFIG_SCHED_SMT)
 	/*
-	 * Preferred wake up cpu nominated by sched_mc balance that will be
-	 * used when most cpus are idle in the system indicating overall very
-	 * low system utilisation. Triggered at POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP(2)
+	 * Preferred wake up cpu which is nominated by load balancer,
+	 * is the CPU on which the tasks would be woken up, which
+	 * otherwise would have woken up on an idle CPU even on a system
+	 * with low-cpu-utilization.
+	 * This is triggered at POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP(2).
 	 */
-	unsigned int sched_mc_preferred_wakeup_cpu;
+	unsigned int preferred_wakeup_cpu;
 #endif
 };
 
@@ -3416,7 +3418,7 @@ out_balanced:
 	if (this == group_leader && group_leader != group_min) {
 		*imbalance = min_load_per_task;
 		if (active_power_savings_level >= POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP) {
-			cpu_rq(this_cpu)->rd->sched_mc_preferred_wakeup_cpu =
+			cpu_rq(this_cpu)->rd->preferred_wakeup_cpu =
 				cpumask_first(sched_group_cpus(group_leader));
 		}
 		return group_min;
diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
index a3583c6..03b1e3c 100644
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -1052,7 +1052,7 @@ static int wake_idle(int cpu, struct task_struct *p)
 
 	this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
 	chosen_wakeup_cpu =
-		cpu_rq(this_cpu)->rd->sched_mc_preferred_wakeup_cpu;
+		cpu_rq(this_cpu)->rd->preferred_wakeup_cpu;
 
 	if (active_power_savings_level >= POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE_WAKEUP &&
 		idle_cpu(cpu) && idle_cpu(this_cpu) &&

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ