[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200903181037.16043.borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:37:15 +0100
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: VIRTIO_BLK_T_SCSI_CMD handling in virtio-blk
Am Wednesday 18 March 2009 10:16:43 schrieb Hannes Reinecke:
> - end_dequeued_request(vbr->req, uptodate);
> + if (blk_pc_request(vbr->req)) {
> + vbr->req->data_len = vbr->in_hdr.residual;
> + bytes = vbr->in_hdr.data_len;
> + vbr->req->sense_len = vbr->in_hdr.sense_len;
> + vbr->req->errors = vbr->in_hdr.status;
> + } else
I think we identified a bug in the old patch:
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kvm/2008/8/29/3127594
http://kerneltrap.org/index.php?q=mailarchive/linux-kvm/2008/8/29/3128124
Is this fixup still valid?
- if (blk_pc_request(vbr->req)) {
+ if (blk_pc_request(vbr->req) && len >= sizeof(vbr->in_hdr)) {
I forgot almost all details about the problem.
Christian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists