linux-kernel - [PATCH] Kprobes: Fix locking imbalance in kretprobes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090318113621.GB4129@in.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:06:21 +0530
From:	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>, bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH] Kprobes: Fix locking imbalance in kretprobes

Fix locking imbalance in kretprobes:

=====================================
[ BUG: bad unlock balance detected! ]
-------------------------------------
kthreadd/2 is trying to release lock (&rp->lock) at:
[<c06b3080>] pre_handler_kretprobe+0xea/0xf4
but there are no more locks to release!

other info that might help us debug this:
1 lock held by kthreadd/2:
 #0:  (rcu_read_lock){..--}, at: [<c06b2b24>] __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x0/0x5a

stack backtrace:
Pid: 2, comm: kthreadd Not tainted 2.6.29-rc8 #1
Call Trace:
 [<c06ae498>] ? printk+0xf/0x17
 [<c06b3080>] ? pre_handler_kretprobe+0xea/0xf4
 [<c044ce6c>] print_unlock_inbalance_bug+0xc3/0xce
 [<c0444d4b>] ? clocksource_read+0x7/0xa
 [<c04450a4>] ? getnstimeofday+0x5f/0xf6
 [<c044a9ca>] ? register_lock_class+0x17/0x293
 [<c044b72c>] ? mark_lock+0x1e/0x30b
 [<c0448956>] ? tick_dev_program_event+0x4a/0xbc
 [<c0498100>] ? __slab_alloc+0xa5/0x415
 [<c06b2fbe>] ? pre_handler_kretprobe+0x28/0xf4
 [<c06b3080>] ? pre_handler_kretprobe+0xea/0xf4
 [<c044cf1b>] lock_release_non_nested+0xa4/0x1a5
 [<c06b3080>] ? pre_handler_kretprobe+0xea/0xf4
 [<c044d15d>] lock_release+0x141/0x166
 [<c06b07dd>] _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x19/0x50
 [<c06b3080>] pre_handler_kretprobe+0xea/0xf4
 [<c06b20b5>] kprobe_exceptions_notify+0x1c9/0x43e
 [<c06b2b02>] notifier_call_chain+0x26/0x48
 [<c06b2b5b>] __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x37/0x5a
 [<c06b2b24>] ? __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x0/0x5a
 [<c06b2b8a>] atomic_notifier_call_chain+0xc/0xe
 [<c0442d0d>] notify_die+0x2d/0x2f
 [<c06b0f9c>] do_int3+0x1f/0x71
 [<c06b0e84>] int3+0x2c/0x34
 [<c042d476>] ? do_fork+0x1/0x288
 [<c040221b>] ? kernel_thread+0x71/0x79
 [<c043ed1b>] ? kthread+0x0/0x60
 [<c043ed1b>] ? kthread+0x0/0x60
 [<c04040b8>] ? kernel_thread_helper+0x0/0x10
 [<c043ec7f>] kthreadd+0xac/0x148
 [<c043ebd3>] ? kthreadd+0x0/0x148
 [<c04040bf>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10

Signed-off-by: Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>
Tested-by: Bharata B Rao <bharata@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/kprobes.c |    4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

Index: utrace-16mar/kernel/kprobes.c
===================================================================
--- utrace-16mar.orig/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ utrace-16mar/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -912,10 +912,8 @@ static int __kprobes pre_handler_kretpro
 		ri->rp = rp;
 		ri->task = current;
 
-		if (rp->entry_handler && rp->entry_handler(ri, regs)) {
-			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rp->lock, flags);
+		if (rp->entry_handler && rp->entry_handler(ri, regs))
 			return 0;
-		}
 
 		arch_prepare_kretprobe(ri, regs);
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/