[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9c3a7c20903171823g1e6c42b9t5f042d550a6ddd47@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:23:46 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
Cc: linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: TXx9 Soc DMA Controller driver
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:02:14 -0700, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> BTW, there are another holes in dma_async_device_register. If
> idr_pre_get or idr_get_new was failed, idr_ref will not be freed.
Thanks for these fixlets, I appreciate it.
Now, back to the issue at hand. Does your driver still need direct
control over chan->chan_id, or can it now rely on the fact that
dma_async_device_register() will fail if a channel is not initialized?
Or, just use some platform_data to identify the channel in the same
manner as atmel-mci?
Regards,
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists