[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090318135222.GA4629@csn.ul.ie>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:52:23 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 24/27] Convert gfp_zone() to use a table of
precalculated values
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 03:12:50PM -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > +int gfp_zone_table[GFP_ZONEMASK] __read_mostly;
>
> The gfp_zone_table is compile time determinable. There is no need to
> calculate it.
>
The cost of calculating it is negligible and the code is then freed later
in boot. Does having a const table make any difference?
> const int gfp_zone_table[GFP_ZONEMASK] = {
> ZONE_NORMAL, /* 00 No flags set */
> ZONE_DMA, /* 01 Only GFP_DMA set */
> ZONE_HIGHMEM, /* 02 Only GFP_HIGHMEM set */
> ZONE_DMA, /* 03 GFP_HIGHMEM and GFP_DMA set */
> ZONE_DMA32, /* 04 Only GFP_DMA32 set */
> ZONE_DMA, /* 05 GFP_DMA and GFP_DMA32 set */
> ZONE_DMA32, /* 06 GFP_DMA32 and GFP_HIGHMEM set */
> ZONE_DMA, /* 07 GFP_DMA, GFP_DMA32 and GFP_DMA32 set */
> ZONE_MOVABLE, /* 08 Only ZONE_MOVABLE set */
> ZONE_DMA, /* 09 MOVABLE + DMA */
> ZONE_MOVABLE, /* 0A MOVABLE + HIGHMEM */
> ZONE_DMA, /* 0B MOVABLE + DMA + HIGHMEM */
> ZONE_DMA32, /* 0C MOVABLE + DMA32 */
> ZONE_DMA, /* 0D MOVABLE + DMA + DMA32 */
> ZONE_DMA32, /* 0E MOVABLE + DMA32 + HIGHMEM */
> ZONE_DMA /* 0F MOVABLE + DMA32 + HIGHMEM + DMA
> };
>
> Hmmmm... Guess one would need to add some #ifdeffery here to setup
> ZONE_NORMAL in cases there is no DMA, DMA32 and HIGHMEM.
>
Indeed, as I said, this is somewhat error prone which is why the patch
calculates the table at run-time instead of compile-time trickery.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists