[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090318150833.GC4629@csn.ul.ie>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 15:08:33 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
Zhang Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/35] Use a pre-calculated value for num_online_nodes()
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:47:35PM -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:08:25PM -0400, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > On Mon, 16 Mar 2009, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > >
> > > > +extern int static_num_online_nodes;
> > >
> > > Strange name. Could we name this nr_online_nodes or so?
> > >
> >
> > It's to match the function name. Arguably I could also have replaced the
> > implementation of num_online_nodes() with a version that uses the static
> > variable.
>
> We have nr_node_ids etc. It would be consistant with that naming.
>
Naming has never been great, but in this case the static value is a
direct replacement of num_online_nodes(). I think having a
similarly-named-but-still-different name obscures more than it helps.
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists