[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9c3a7c20903181026h1801ef6i945e6ce9ccb36b8a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:26:13 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp>
Cc: linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dmaengine: TXx9 Soc DMA Controller driver
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@....ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 18:23:46 -0700, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
>> Or, just use some platform_data to identify the channel in the same
>> manner as atmel-mci?
>
> Yes, I still want to control chan->chan_id.
>
> The atmel-mci does not select "channel". It just pick the first
> usable channel of the dma_device specified by platform_data. I
> suppose dw_dmac is symmetric (it can use any channel for any slave).
You are right, it does not hardwire the channel, but it does hardwire
the device, see at32_add_device_mci [1].
> But TXx9 SoC DMAC channels are hardwired to each peripheral devices.
I think creating a dma_device instance per channel and specifying that
device like atmel-mci is the more future-proof way to go.
> And I want to call Channel-3 of DMAC-0 "dma0chan3" even if Channel-2
> was assigned to for public memcpy channel.
The problem is you could pass in the chan_id to guarantee 'chan3', but
there is no guarantee that you will get 'dma0', as the driver has no
knowledge of what other dma devices may be in the system.
[1] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=blob;f=arch/avr32/mach-at32ap/at32ap700x.c;h=3fbfd1e32a9ee79af4f4545d95a9543b9070d189;hb=HEAD#l1327
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists