lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:29:02 +1100
From:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	mingo@...e.hu, rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 09/11] perf_counter: revamp syscall input ABI

Peter Zijlstra writes:

> The hardware/software classification in hw_event->type became a little strained
> due to the addition of tracepoint tracing.
> 
> Instead split up the field and provide a type field to explicitly specify the
> counter type, while using the event_id field to specify which event to use.
> 
> Raw counters still work as before, only the raw config now goes into raw_event.

Interesting idea, but why not also use it to express the distinction
between generic and raw hardware events ids?  Why not add a
PERF_TYPE_RAW_HARDWARE to this list:

> + * hw_event.type
> + */
> +enum perf_event_types {
> +	PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE		= 0,
> +	PERF_TYPE_SOFTWARE		= 1,
> +	PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT		= 2,
> +};

and get rid of the raw bit?  That way, hw_event.raw_event is unique
for every different event, whereas the way you have it, you still need
to include the raw bit to get a unique id.

Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ