[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090317195004.18fb6af6.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 19:50:04 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, jkosina@...e.cz, gregkh@...e.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
Subject: Re: 29-rc-mmotm - HID/USB wedge w/ WARNING: at
kernel/workqueue.c:371
On Wed, 18 Mar 2009 10:29:40 +0800 Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Mar 2009 13:54:24 PDT, Andrew Morton said:
> >
> >> It's an error in workqueue-avoid-recursion-in-run_workqueue.patch, methinks.
> >
> > Thanks for the diagnosis - I got as far as realizing that any backtrace that
> > included flush_cpu_workqueue() and worker_thread() had a problem and got
> > stuck there.
> >
>
> It's dangerous when we allow recursion in run_workqueue().
static void run_workqueue(struct cpu_workqueue_struct *cwq)
{
spin_lock_irq(&cwq->lock);
cwq->run_depth++;
if (cwq->run_depth > 3) {
/* morton gets to eat his hat */
printk("%s: recursion depth exceeded: %d\n",
__func__, cwq->run_depth);
dump_stack();
}
That was added five or six years ago, and I never ever got to eat my hat.
> If it's hard for you avoid flush_scheduled_work() in
> keventd's work fuction by other fix, you can create
> another workqueue to handle your works, IMO.
Why do we need to change anything here? No known bugs were fixed, and some
new ones were added.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists