[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1237412967-20754-2-git-send-email-dmitri.vorobiev@movial.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:49:26 +0200
From: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@...ial.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@...ial.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] Restrict definition of a label in kernel/module.c
In function 'load_module' in kernel/module.c, the label 'free_init'
is used if and only if both CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD and CONFIG_SMP are
defined. However, the label itself is defined unconditionally,
which may produce the following warning:
kernel/module.c:2291: warning: label 'free_init' defined but not used
This patch fixes the warning by moving the label definition under an
appropriate preprocessor construct.
Signed-off-by: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@...ial.com>
---
kernel/module.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index 1196f5d..df00a1b 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -2288,8 +2288,8 @@ static noinline struct module *load_module(void __user *umod,
ftrace_release(mod->module_core, mod->core_size);
free_unload:
module_unload_free(mod);
- free_init:
#if defined(CONFIG_MODULE_UNLOAD) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
+ free_init:
percpu_modfree(mod->refptr);
#endif
module_free(mod, mod->module_init);
--
1.5.6.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists