[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <18881.29300.669876.820286@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:15:16 +1100
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 09/11] perf_counter: revamp syscall input ABI
Peter Zijlstra writes:
> Ah, I thought we should keep a pure 64 bit raw value. You never know
> what hardware will do.
Oh I see, you use hw_event->raw_event if hw_event->raw is set. I
missed that before.
Still, you're putting that into hwc->config along with other bits like
ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_USR and ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_OS, so I would
think we could spare two bits for the type, leaving 62 bits for the
raw event code. And if that isn't enough, there's the
hw_event.extra_config_len field, which allows userspace to pass in
arbitrary amounts of extra PMU configuration data.
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists