[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090319084444.GA4123@psychotron.englab.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 09:44:45 +0100
From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: shemminger@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, jgarzik@...ox.com,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, fubar@...ibm.com,
bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bonding: allow bond in mode balance-alb to work
properly in bridge
Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 07:20:03AM CET, davem@...emloft.net wrote:
>From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>
>Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:11:28 +0100
>
>> I can see two solutions. Either like my patch or somehow allow bridge to know
>> more MAC addressses per port (maybe netdev can be changed to know more then
>> one MAC address).
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>
>The netdev struct already supports having a list of multiple unicast
>MAC addresses, it can probably be used and inspected for this.
Yes I was looking at this thing yesterday (uc_list). But this list serves
to different purpose. Do you think that it will be correct to use it for this? I
would maybe like to make a new list similar to this for our purpose
(say addr_list). I think it would be more correct.
Eventually in the furute we would use this list as a primary place to store
device address instead of dev_addr value and make it more general (as device
generally may have more adresses). Just a thought...
>
>I'll hold off on your patch until we make some more progress on
>this discussion.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists