[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090318.183930.35290998.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:39:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: fubar@...ibm.com
Cc: jesper@...gh.cc, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, jgarzik@...hat.com, aowi@...ozymes.com
Subject: Re: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected
- twice
From: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@...ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:27:16 -0700
> David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
>
> >From: Jesper Krogh <jesper@...gh.cc>
> >Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:53:39 +0100
> >
> >> Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> >> > However, I did find another bug I introduced during the "mii
> >> > refactor" patch that you mentioned as being the original source of the
> >> > problem. That bug will cause 802.3ad to not notice speed changes.
> >> > Could you test the patch below on your 2.6.68.7 and/or 2.6.27.19
> >> > and see if it resolves your problem (without the forcedeth patch)?
> >>
> >> There was something missing from the header to make it compile.. I found that in a later version. Patch below fixed the problem (without the forcedeth patch).
> >
> >Jay please resend this with proper signoffs etc. if you want
> >me to apply it.
>
> I posted it again with the usual stuff a day or two after I
> posted the test patch; I'll append it to the end of this email. Note
> that the below patch has a minor cosmetic change from the test patch.
>
> I believe this fix should go to -stable for 2.6.26 and 2.6.27,
> but it'll need the change Jesper added to pick up a macro that was added
> to mainline:
Applied and I'll queue it up for -stable too, thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists