linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3 6/6] sched: Fix sd_parent_degenerate for SD_POWERSAVINGS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:27:36 +0530
From:	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3 6/6] sched: Fix sd_parent_degenerate for
	SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE.

* Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com> [2009-03-18 14:52:48]:

> Currently a sched_domain having a single group can be prevented from getting
> degenerated if it contains a SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE flag. But since it has
> only one group, it won't have any scope for performing powersavings balance as
> it does not have a sibling group to pull from.
> 
> Apart from not provide any powersavings, it also fails to participate
> in normal load-balancing.
> 
> Fix this by allowing such a sched_domain to degenerate and pass on the
> responsibility of performing the POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE to it's parent domain.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@...ibm.com>
> Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> 
>  kernel/sched.c |   14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched.c b/kernel/sched.c
> index 651550c..0e7882a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -6970,6 +6970,20 @@ sd_parent_degenerate(struct sched_domain *sd, struct sched_domain *parent)
>  				SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES);
>  		if (nr_node_ids == 1)
>  			pflags &= ~SD_SERIALIZE;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * If the only flag that is preventing us from degenerating
> +		 * a domain with a single group is SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE
> +		 * check if it can be transferred to the new parent,
> +		 * and degenerate this domain. With a single
> +		 * group, it anyway can't contribute to power-aware load
> +		 * balancing.

                   can't contribute to any form of load balancing or
                   power savings.  

                   (SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE flags has not being
                   listed in the flags needing more than 1 group)

> +		 */
> +		if (pflags & SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE && parent->parent) {
> +			pflags &= ~SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE;
> +			parent->parent->flags |=
> +				sd_power_saving_flags(parent->level);
> +		}
>  	}
>  	if (~cflags & pflags)
>  		return 0;

--Vaidy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/