| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1237483726.5227.3.camel@nga>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:28:46 +0100
From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
To: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: sched: delayed cleanup of user_struct
On Thu, 2009-03-19 at 15:04 +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 03:47:58PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-03-10 at 00:19 +0530, Dhaval Giani wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 07:37:17PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >
> > > > This change delays the execution of the (already existing) scheduled
> > > > work, to cleanup the uid after 0.5 seconds, so the allocated and announced
> > > > uid can possibly be re-used by another process.
> >
> > > makes sense. I do have a patch though which changes some of the cleanup
> > > code (fixing a memory leak) in -mm. These two patches will conflict.
> >
> > Ah, I see. Updated. Could you give this a try on top of your changes?
> Looks good to me!
> Acked-by: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Added. Thanks.
> > +/* uidhash_lock must be held */
>
> There is already a comment mentioning this before the set of routines
> starts.
Ah, good. Removed.
Greg,
can you pick this up?
Thanks,
Kay
From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Subject: sched: delayed cleanup of user_struct
During bootup performance tracing we see repeated occurrences of
/sys/kernel/uid/* events for the same uid, leading to a,
in this case, rather pointless userspace processing for the
same uid over and over.
This is usually caused by tools which change their uid to "nobody",
to run without privileges to read data supplied by untrusted users.
This change delays the execution of the (already existing) scheduled
work, to cleanup the uid after one second, so the allocated and announced
uid can possibly be re-used by another process.
This is the current behavior, where almost every invocation of a
binary, which changes the uid, creates two events:
$ read START < /sys/kernel/uevent_seqnum; \
for i in `seq 100`; do su --shell=/bin/true bin; done; \
read END < /sys/kernel/uevent_seqnum; \
echo $(($END - $START))
178
With the delayed cleanup, we get only two events, and userspace finishes
a bit faster too:
$ read START < /sys/kernel/uevent_seqnum; \
for i in `seq 100`; do su --shell=/bin/true bin; done; \
read END < /sys/kernel/uevent_seqnum; \
echo $(($END - $START))
1
Acked-by: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
---
include/linux/sched.h | 2 +-
kernel/user.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ struct user_struct {
struct task_group *tg;
#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
struct kobject kobj;
- struct work_struct work;
+ struct delayed_work work;
#endif
#endif
};
--- a/kernel/user.c
+++ b/kernel/user.c
@@ -82,7 +82,9 @@ static struct user_struct *uid_hash_find
hlist_for_each_entry(user, h, hashent, uidhash_node) {
if (user->uid == uid) {
- atomic_inc(&user->__count);
+ /* possibly resurrect an "almost deleted" object */
+ if (atomic_inc_return(&user->__count) == 1)
+ cancel_delayed_work(&user->work);
return user;
}
}
@@ -283,12 +285,12 @@ int __init uids_sysfs_init(void)
return uids_user_create(&root_user);
}
-/* work function to remove sysfs directory for a user and free up
+/* delayed work function to remove sysfs directory for a user and free up
* corresponding structures.
*/
static void cleanup_user_struct(struct work_struct *w)
{
- struct user_struct *up = container_of(w, struct user_struct, work);
+ struct user_struct *up = container_of(w, struct user_struct, work.work);
unsigned long flags;
int remove_user = 0;
@@ -297,15 +299,12 @@ static void cleanup_user_struct(struct w
*/
uids_mutex_lock();
- local_irq_save(flags);
-
- if (atomic_dec_and_lock(&up->__count, &uidhash_lock)) {
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&uidhash_lock, flags);
+ if (atomic_read(&up->__count) == 0) {
uid_hash_remove(up);
remove_user = 1;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uidhash_lock, flags);
- } else {
- local_irq_restore(flags);
}
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uidhash_lock, flags);
if (!remove_user)
goto done;
@@ -331,12 +330,8 @@ done:
*/
static void free_user(struct user_struct *up, unsigned long flags)
{
- /* restore back the count */
- atomic_inc(&up->__count);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uidhash_lock, flags);
-
- INIT_WORK(&up->work, cleanup_user_struct);
- schedule_work(&up->work);
+ schedule_delayed_work(&up->work, msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
}
#else /* CONFIG_USER_SCHED && CONFIG_SYSFS */
@@ -442,6 +437,8 @@ struct user_struct *alloc_uid(struct use
if (uids_user_create(new))
goto out_destoy_sched;
+ INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&new->work, cleanup_user_struct);
+
/*
* Before adding this, check whether we raced
* on adding the same user already..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists