linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for March 19 (wireless/p54)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200903191850.17825.mb@bu3sch.de>
Date:	Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:50:17 +0100
From:	Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 19 (wireless/p54)

On Thursday 19 March 2009 18:28:30 Randy Dunlap wrote:
> Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Changes since 20090318:
> 
> 
> ERROR: "led_classdev_register" [drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54common.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "led_classdev_unregister" [drivers/net/wireless/p54/p54common.ko] undefined!
> 
> One possible option (fix) is to have CONFIG_MAC80211_LEDS also select
> LEDS_CLASS (that would build the missing functions).

Does p54 select CONFIG_MAC80211_LEDS? If that's the case, I think it should
probably do it the other way around. p54 should build its LED code if CONFIG_MAC80211_LEDS
is available. Otherwise it should not.

This way you don't enter the SELECT dependency hell and still have automagic configuration.

Take a look at b43 for an example.

-- 
Greetings, Michael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/