[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0903191839330.12886@blonde.anvils>
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:44:12 +0000 (GMT)
From: Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
To: Joe Malicki <jmalicki@...acarta.com>
cc: chrisw@...s-sol.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CRED: Fix check_unsafe_exec()
On Tue, 17 Mar 2009, Joe Malicki wrote:
> ----- "Joe Malicki" <jmalicki@...acarta.com> wrote:
> > ----- "Hugh Dickins" <hugh@...itas.com> wrote:
> > > Yes, I'm inclined to go with that, and removing the files->count
> > > check from exec.c. Joe, did you manage to try your testing with
> > > my original patch plus that files->count check removed from 2.6.28's
> > > unsafe_exec()?
> >
> > Sorry for not responding earlier.
> >
> > I still got one failure with this new patch. I added some printks
> > to illuminate exactly why it's failing when it fails to setuid, but
> > of course, since adding the printks I haven't reproduced yet.
>
> My tests were accidentally run without removing the files->count check.
Oh good, thanks Joe, I was hoping that would be the case.
> The printks confirmed the failure case was the files->count check,
> and removing the files->check has worked thus far (though I can't be
> sure until after a day or two has gone by given how infrequent it is).
Okay, unless we hear bad news from you later, I'll post the set of three
patches (removing the files->count check, then my original fs->count one,
plus David's comment) in a day or two, adding a few more Ccs.
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists